Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • David Loughry 3:27 pm on September 2, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , equipoise, vibrant   

    This interesting op-ed by David Brooks called “In Praise of Equipoise” includes some of the reasons I started this site, and the Los Angeles Variety People meetup group.

    Advertisements
     
    • David Loughry 3:58 pm on September 2, 2017 Permalink | Reply

      Reblogged this on David Loughry and commented:

      Highly recommended. Here’s one quick quote from it: “The second step is to refuse to be a monad.”

  • David Loughry 2:55 pm on June 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: addiction, connections, drugs, friends, rats, , science   

    I loved the story about “Rat Park” in this video. It may show that when people have adequate variety in their lives, other kinds of dysfunctional things might happen less. I also like when he talks about the idea that we’ve traded stuff and space for friends and connections. And, that we need to cure addictions at the social level, not just the individual level. Perhaps valuing, allowing, seeking and managing variety in our lives might be part of that.

     
  • David Loughry 6:12 pm on December 25, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , passion, surprise   

    More arguments against having just one passion and one career in life!

     
  • David Loughry 1:28 pm on December 23, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: galaxies, gender, Jo Progo, multiplicity, , pluralism, unity, YouTube   

    A perspective on variety in gender and more generally in life. 

    Interesting take on having variety in your gender. More generally, it also captures some of what having variety in life involves.

     
  • David Loughry 12:50 am on December 21, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: adaptability, , challenges, curiosity, human potential, idea synthesis, multidimensional problems, multiple interests, passions, polymath, purpose, rapid learning, renaissance, TEDtalk   

    On people who have a range of interests and jobs over a lifetime … 

    This video may resonate with many variety people. However I think almost anyone can benefit from and enjoy more variety. I don’t think you have to be exactly like she’s talking about here to pursue and enjoy more variety. This video may also help some people understand variety people better.

     
    • David Loughry 1:33 pm on December 21, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Reblogged this on David Loughry and commented:

      Love this. Explains a lot of my history! After much wandering and anguish, I settled on this idea of being a variety person, and it’s partly why I started varietypeople.org.

  • David Loughry 2:57 pm on March 25, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: advice, , , , Quora   

    Interesting discussion on Quora about "wanting to do too many things in life" … 

    This relates to questions that come up when wanting and/or pursuing a life of variety:
    http://www.quora.com/Im-in-my-early-20s-and-is-there-such-thing-as-wanting-to-do-too-many-things-in-life

    It reminds me of some of the things I’ve thought about and struggled with over the years. Those struggles were part of how I came up with some of the ideas about being a variety person, and part of why I started this site!

    I guess I’m more of the opinion that it’s better to have a certain amount of variety on a daily and weekly basis. Some of the people who responded to the Quora question suggest doing one thing for a number of years and then switching. I’ve done some of that too. But I wish I had been more OK with having more variety during those times. And I wish society was more set up to allow that, rather than generally channeling people to specialize.

     
    • David Loughry 3:14 pm on March 25, 2015 Permalink | Reply

      Reblogged this on David Loughry and commented:

      Interesting link I shared that relates to my variety life as well, which I discuss a bit in the post.

  • David Loughry 9:25 pm on January 30, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , fast company, life-hacks, , ,   

    Research Showing Some Variety People May Have More Creative Ideas 

    I was reading an article in Fast Company when I came across some research showing something I had suspected in a general way. It said “individuals connected to disparate clusters of people have more creative ideas than those with homogenous, closed social networks.” It’s based on an aspect of network science called “brokerage,” pioneered by Professor Ronald S. Burt at the University of Chicago.

    I have observed over the years that people who explore diverse ideas, areas, people, processes, etc. seem to make more integrated and novel creative connections. Such people are a kind of variety people, and “individuals connected to disparate clusters of people” are a kind of subset of the people I’m talking about. So the research shows, you may well boost your creativity by being the kind of variety person who is connected to disparate clusters of people!

    Here’s the link to the full article, about an entrepreneur in Silicon Valley:
    http://www.fastcompany.com/3037933/the-visible-man

     
  • David Loughry 3:04 pm on October 26, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: cars, driving,   

    What kinds of cars might be good for variety people? 

    Here are some random thoughts about what kinds of cars might work for variety people. Feel free to add your thoughts in the comments.

    Maybe you don’t want a fancy expensive car, or only one expensive car. Maybe you want one that doesn’t stand out, so you can blend into a variety of situations and go a variety of different places. Or one that exhibits a variety of characteristics, like high end but older. Or you might join a car sharing service so you can drive a variety of different cars. Maybe dealers should offer leases that let you change cars when you feel like it. Maybe you don’t want a lot of money tied up in a car, or one that gets great mileage, so you have money for a variety of other experiences. Plus, research has shown that it’s less the things you own, and more the things you do, that make you happy.

     
    • David Loughry 3:12 pm on October 26, 2014 Permalink | Reply

      Reblogged this on Loughry and commented:

      I just wrote a new post about cars for the Variety People site. Feel free to add your thoughts in the comments over there.

  • David Loughry 5:16 pm on July 30, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: art, art collecting, beautiful places, beauty, , fine art, , , homes, , lifestyle, , , real estate, ,   

    Getting Tired of Beautiful and Special Things 

    This is a post I shared on my personal blog, but it’s perfect for here too. —David

    I don’t know about you, but I can get tired of even the most beautiful and special things. I think this is probably true for most people.

    I’ve lived in beautiful places like Boulder and Vail in Colorado, both of which I appreciated less over time. I’ve taken truly special photos, put them on my phone as the background, and gotten tired of them. I’ve made awesome art I loved and grew less fond of it, and seen amazing, historically important art in museums that started to bore me over time. I’ve listened to great music too much and cared for it less and less. You get the drift.

    This is why I think differently when I see houses by the beach, or in the mountains, or some other amazing place. I’ve realized, yes, it would be great to live there for a while, but I would not want to live there for the rest of my life, or even for too many months or years. So I would not want to pay the high premiums people pay for houses in those places! For the same reasons, I avoid collecting expensive art, as I would get tired of it so quickly.

    This line of thinking also probably implies I would get tired of being wealthy!

    The thoughts in this post are yet more arguments for variety. And when you think about variety for a while, you’ll probably realize what you want is sustainable variety. At least that’s what I realized. This means finding ways of living over weeks, and months, and years, that give you variety you don’t get tired of! I don’t want kinds of variety that are like beautiful and special things that I get tired of. I want varieties of variety, and I want that to be sustainable, so I stay engaged and have the potential to keep being engaged. I think probably one of the best ways to get sustainable variety is to also pursue sustainable proximities. I think the two go together. Although that’s another topic, for now, here’s more on what I call the sustainable proximities approach at http://proxthink.com/ways/sustainable-proximities.php.

    If some of this rings true, you might be a bit of a variety person. You might want to join us here on varietypeople.org.

     
  • David Loughry 2:48 pm on June 25, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: debates, diet, diets, eating, food, , optimal, plants,   

    The Variety of Food Problem and Optimal Variety 

    One challenge to a variety point of view might be what you could call the food problem.

    If variety is what seems important, you might point out that diets we generally know to be unhealthy can include plenty of variety. So what’s the problem with those diets?

    Here’s where you get into debates about whether certain kinds of variety might be better than others. And I think the answer is probably yes, certain kinds of variety are probably better than others, for some or even many kinds of situations.

    For many kinds of situations, there may be sets of possibilities which still fall within a wider range which could be considered more optimal variety. And, in contrast, sets of possibilities which mostly fall outside that range of more optimal variety can probably still have plenty of variety, but they are less optimal.

    A good example is food. Diets largely consisting of a wide variety of plant-based foods are generally considered to be the most healthy. So you see here there is room for a lot of variety, within the range of plant-based foods. This also implies that too narrow a variety of plant-based foods could also be a problem. And it says that if your diet does not largely consist of, meaning if the diet is not dominated by, plant-based foods, then that is also probably a problem. So you could say that the optimal variety regarding food (assuming health is what you’re going for) is a diet largely consisting of a wide variety of plant-based foods. And so, less-optimal diets could still have plenty of variety, but that variety would not be more optimal variety.

    I guess we would have to admit here that, if death and disease are what you’re going for, there would be a different optimal variety of foods for that! And, admit that there are probably different opinions regarding which kinds of optimal variety in food are most healthful!

    The takeaway here, for variety people, would seem to be that we shouldn’t only go for variety, but consider what the optimal variety would or might be. This also relates to the idea from our About page that “we shouldn’t pursue variety just for variety’s sake.” It’s also probably worth mentioning that optimal variety may often overlap, or arise alongside, variety which is sustainable. Further, only allowing yourself to eat a diet of optimal variety, when other important considerations are factors, such as survival, might not be optimal in a larger sense, and also goes against an openness to having a variety of variety.

    Finally, broadly and generally, pursuing variety in the short and the long term, will probably lead you to seeking and finding sustainable variety, and so a variety perspective is a useful general strategy for many kinds of situations. This also relates to some new research on what intelligence is, but that’s a post for another day. Stay tuned! (Of course, these days we don’t really tune into things like radio and TV, so much as just turn them on!)

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: