Tagged: health Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • David Loughry 5:16 pm on July 30, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: art, art collecting, beautiful places, beauty, , fine art, , health, homes, , lifestyle, , , real estate, ,   

    Getting Tired of Beautiful and Special Things 

    This is a post I shared on my personal blog, but it’s perfect for here too. —David

    I don’t know about you, but I can get tired of even the most beautiful and special things. I think this is probably true for most people.

    I’ve lived in beautiful places like Boulder and Vail in Colorado, both of which I appreciated less over time. I’ve taken truly special photos, put them on my phone as the background, and gotten tired of them. I’ve made awesome art I loved and grew less fond of it, and seen amazing, historically important art in museums that started to bore me over time. I’ve listened to great music too much and cared for it less and less. You get the drift.

    This is why I think differently when I see houses by the beach, or in the mountains, or some other amazing place. I’ve realized, yes, it would be great to live there for a while, but I would not want to live there for the rest of my life, or even for too many months or years. So I would not want to pay the high premiums people pay for houses in those places! For the same reasons, I avoid collecting expensive art, as I would get tired of it so quickly.

    This line of thinking also probably implies I would get tired of being wealthy!

    The thoughts in this post are yet more arguments for variety. And when you think about variety for a while, you’ll probably realize what you want is sustainable variety. At least that’s what I realized. This means finding ways of living over weeks, and months, and years, that give you variety you don’t get tired of! I don’t want kinds of variety that are like beautiful and special things that I get tired of. I want varieties of variety, and I want that to be sustainable, so I stay engaged and have the potential to keep being engaged. I think probably one of the best ways to get sustainable variety is to also pursue sustainable proximities. I think the two go together. Although that’s another topic, for now, here’s more on what I call the sustainable proximities approach at http://proxthink.com/ways/sustainable-proximities.php.

    If some of this rings true, you might be a bit of a variety person. You might want to join us here on varietypeople.org.

  • David Loughry 2:48 pm on June 25, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: debates, diet, diets, eating, food, health, optimal, plants,   

    The Variety of Food Problem and Optimal Variety 

    One challenge to a variety point of view might be what you could call the food problem.

    If variety is what seems important, you might point out that diets we generally know to be unhealthy can include plenty of variety. So what’s the problem with those diets?

    Here’s where you get into debates about whether certain kinds of variety might be better than others. And I think the answer is probably yes, certain kinds of variety are probably better than others, for some or even many kinds of situations.

    For many kinds of situations, there may be sets of possibilities which still fall within a wider range which could be considered more optimal variety. And, in contrast, sets of possibilities which mostly fall outside that range of more optimal variety can probably still have plenty of variety, but they are less optimal.

    A good example is food. Diets largely consisting of a wide variety of plant-based foods are generally considered to be the most healthy. So you see here there is room for a lot of variety, within the range of plant-based foods. This also implies that too narrow a variety of plant-based foods could also be a problem. And it says that if your diet does not largely consist of, meaning if the diet is not dominated by, plant-based foods, then that is also probably a problem. So you could say that the optimal variety regarding food (assuming health is what you’re going for) is a diet largely consisting of a wide variety of plant-based foods. And so, less-optimal diets could still have plenty of variety, but that variety would not be more optimal variety.

    I guess we would have to admit here that, if death and disease are what you’re going for, there would be a different optimal variety of foods for that! And, admit that there are probably different opinions regarding which kinds of optimal variety in food are most healthful!

    The takeaway here, for variety people, would seem to be that we shouldn’t only go for variety, but consider what the optimal variety would or might be. This also relates to the idea from our About page that “we shouldn’t pursue variety just for variety’s sake.” It’s also probably worth mentioning that optimal variety may often overlap, or arise alongside, variety which is sustainable. Further, only allowing yourself to eat a diet of optimal variety, when other important considerations are factors, such as survival, might not be optimal in a larger sense, and also goes against an openness to having a variety of variety.

    Finally, broadly and generally, pursuing variety in the short and the long term, will probably lead you to seeking and finding sustainable variety, and so a variety perspective is a useful general strategy for many kinds of situations. This also relates to some new research on what intelligence is, but that’s a post for another day. Stay tuned! (Of course, these days we don’t really tune into things like radio and TV, so much as just turn them on!)

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: